Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
150-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

150-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.004210 50.852354)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.004139 50.852346,-1.004143 50.852360,-1.004152 50.852373,-1.004168 50.852383,-1.004188 50.852390,-1.004209 50.852392,-1.004231 50.852390,-1.004251 50.852384,-1.004267 50.852374,-1.004278 50.852361,-1.004281 50.852348,-1.004278 50.852334,-1.004268 50.852321,-1.004253 50.852311,-1.004233 50.852304,-1.004211 50.852302,-1.004189 50.852304,-1.004169 50.852310,-1.004154 50.852320,-1.004143 50.852332,-1.004139 50.852346)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL